Cloud service providers (CSPs) rely heavily on complex supply chains involving numerous third- and fourth-party providers. To secure customer data end-to-end, it's critical that CSPs require all downstream suppliers to adhere to the same strict information security standards. The Supply Chain Service Agreement Compliance control helps ensure consistent application of security policies across the entire supply chain.

Where did this come from?

This control comes from the CSA Cloud Controls Matrix v4.0.10 released on 2023-09-26. You can download the full matrix here. The matrix provides a comprehensive set of cloud security controls mapped to various compliance frameworks. For more background, check out this intro to the CCM.

Who should care?

This control is highly relevant for:

• CSP vendor management teams responsible for onboarding and managing third-party suppliers
• CSP legal teams that draft and negotiate supplier contracts
• CSP security and compliance teams that define policies suppliers must adhere to
• Enterprise customers with strict data protection requirements evaluating potential CSPs

What is the risk?

Without consistent security controls applied across the supply chain, sensitive customer data is at risk of exposure. A single weak link, such as a SaaS provider with lax access control, could enable a data breach. While the CSP may be highly secure, their efforts could be undermined by less mature suppliers. This control helps mitigate that risk by ensuring a common baseline.

What's the care factor?

For enterprise customers in heavily regulated industries like financial services and healthcare, this control is critical. Any potential for sensitive data exposure is unacceptable. CSPs targeting these customers must prioritize this control to be viable contenders. For CSPs focused on less sensitive use cases, it's still quite important for overall security posture and reputation. A public breach tied to a third-party supplier would be very damaging.

When is it relevant?

This control applies any time a CSP leverages external suppliers that interact with customer data or systems. Some examples:

• A SaaS provider that stores customer data
• A consultant that provides managed services
• An outsourced customer support provider with system access

It may be less critical for commodity suppliers not handling sensitive data, such as an office supply vendor. Although even then, some base level of security is prudent.

What are the trade-offs?

Implementing stringent security requirements across the supply chain requires significant effort:

• Vendor management teams must assess each supplier's practices
• Contracts must be carefully negotiated, often involving legal
• Ongoing audits are needed to verify compliance
• Some suppliers may charge a premium or push back on certain terms

This overhead can slow down supplier onboarding. Some innovative startups may be eliminated due to immature practices. Costs may increase. But for security-conscious CSPs, this is table stakes.

How to make it happen?

1. Define a comprehensive Supplier Security Policy covering:
   • Required security controls (e.g. access control, encryption, logging)
   • Privacy and confidentiality obligations
   • Right to audit clause
   • Service level agreements
   • Incident notification procedures
2. Incorporate policy requirements into a standard supplier contract template
3. Establish a vendor risk assessment program:
   • Require suppliers to fill out security questionnaires
   • Conduct remote or on-site assessments of critical suppliers
   • Score suppliers based on risk and compliance
4. Integrate supplier contracts into procurement workflows
   • Require sign-off from legal and security teams
   • Make contract execution a gate for issuing purchase orders
5. Set up a supplier compliance monitoring function
   • Conduct periodic audits against contract terms
   • Monitor supplier SLAs and security posture
   • Investigate any deviations or incidents
6. Train procurement and vendor management teams on policy

What are some gotchas?

• Some suppliers may resist stringent terms, viewing security as a cost center. It may take escalation to leadership to resolve.
• Verifying supplier compliance is an ongoing effort. Point-in-time audits only go so far. Explore automated monitoring where possible.
• Larger suppliers may have more leverage to push back on terms. Careful negotiation is required to balance security with business needs.
• For smaller CSPs, the resources required to assess every supplier may be prohibitive. Prioritize based on risk and data sensitivity.

What are the alternatives?

• Limit use of external suppliers, keeping sensitive data handling in-house. May not be feasible at scale though.
• Accept risk of non-compliant suppliers, implementing compensating controls. Viable for low sensitivity data only.
• Shift more responsibility to the suppliers themselves via contract terms and indemnification clauses. Needs to be balanced with verification.

Explore further

• CIS Controls v8 includes supply chain risk management controls that complement this CCM control
• NIST 800-161 provides detailed guidance on supply chain risk management practices
• CSA offers a Cloud Supply Chain Security training diving deep on this topic

?